7.08.2015

Faithful and Wise Steward (part one)

On their way out of Jerusalem for the day, the disciples begin commenting on how amazing Herod’s building project is. At this point in history, the entirety of the Temple Mount had not been completed and this immense structure would still be astounding to behold. Jesus responds to his impressed disciples that, in fact, destruction is sitting on the doorstep of Jerusalem, describing how not one stone will be left upon another. Later, his disciples come to him and begin asking him about timelines. Exactly when is this destruction supposed to come?

And with that we are launched into one of the most intensely discussed discourses surrounding the “end times.” We immediately click into our “when-is-Jesus-coming-back-and-how-do-we-tell-the-future” mentality, drowning in all the details. I can remember writing a paper in Bible college on the teaching in Matthew 24 and the argument about which part of the chapter was talking about what. Was the entire conversation about the end times? Was the first part about the destruction of Jerusalem and the last part about the end times? If so, when does the shift take place in Jesus’s discourse?

So, before we even get started, let me make the case up front: This entire discourse is about the destruction of Jerusalem. That is the topic that got Jesus into this conversation, that is the topic that sits at the center of the conversation, and there is nothing in Jesus’s words that would warrant a shift in subject matter. In fact, to turn this into a dialogue about the end times would completely ignore Jesus’s closing points about not knowing the future.


Nevertheless, let’s walk through the passage and try to see how Jesus interacts with this question from the disciples. They want to know, “When is all of this destruction going to take place?” Jesus responds:
“Watch out that no one deceives you. For many will come in my name, claiming, ‘I am the Messiah,’ and will deceive many. You will hear of wars and rumors of wars, but see to it that you are not alarmed. Such things must happen, but the end is still to come. Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. There will be famines and earthquakes in various places. All these are the beginning of birth pains.
“Then you will be handed over to be persecuted and put to death, and you will be hated by all nations because of me. At that time many will turn away from the faith and will betray and hate each other, and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people. Because of the increase of wickedness, the love of most will grow cold, but the one who stands firm to the end will be saved. And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come.
“So when you see standing in the holy place ‘the abomination that causes desolation,’ spoken of through the prophet Daniel—let the reader understand—then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains. Let no one on the housetop go down to take anything out of the house. Let no one in the field go back to get their cloak. How dreadful it will be in those days for pregnant women and nursing mothers! Pray that your flight will not take place in winter or on the Sabbath. For then there will be great distress, unequaled from the beginning of the world until now—and never to be equaled again.”

Jesus’s point: You are going to hear rumors about coming destruction and false messiahs who will promise deliverance. Do not be deceived. The world is going to get crazy. This is unavoidable.

He continues:
“If those days had not been cut short, no one would survive, but for the sake of the elect those days will be shortened. At that time if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Messiah!’ or, ‘There he is!’ do not believe it. For false messiahs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect. See, I have told you ahead of time.
“So if anyone tells you, ‘There he is, out in the wilderness,’ do not go out; or, ‘Here he is, in the inner rooms,’ do not believe it. For as lightning that comes from the east is visible even in the west, so will be the coming of the Son of Man. Wherever there is a carcass, there the vultures will gather.
“Immediately after the distress of those days
“ ‘the sun will be darkened,
    and the moon will not give its light;
the stars will fall from the sky,
    and the heavenly bodies will be shaken.’
“Then will appear the sign of the Son of Man in heaven. And then all the peoples of the earth will mourn when they see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven, with power and great glory. And he will send his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of the heavens to the other.
“Now learn this lesson from the fig tree: As soon as its twigs get tender and its leaves come out, you know that summer is near. Even so, when you see all these things, you know that it is near, right at the door. Truly I tell you, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened. Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away.”
After quoting the book of Daniel, Jesus continues to use multiple prophetic images from the Nevi’im that speak about coming destruction (mainly of ancient Babylon) as a parallel to the coming destruction from Rome. Jesus quotes prophets whose messages will be of perseverance. He reiterates, You are going to have to persevere through these tough times; there will be no escaping it.
Jesus then continues with more confirmation of these points to his disciples:
“But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark; and they knew nothing about what would happen until the flood came and took them all away. That is how it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. Two men will be in the field; one will be taken and the other left. Two women will be grinding with a hand mill; one will be taken and the other left.
“Therefore keep watch, because you do not know on what day your Lord will come. But understand this: If the owner of the house had known at what time of night the thief was coming, he would have kept watch and would not have let his house be broken into. So you also must be ready, because the Son of Man will come at an hour when you do not expect him.”
Please notice that Jesus’s point is that nobody will be ready for this coming destruction. Nobody can tell the future and destruction always comes when people least expect it. Jesus’s point is, Keep watch and be ready, because you do not know when this will happen.

But all of this might raise the question: What are supposed to be ready for? What are we supposed to be ready with? How do I make sure I am doing what I need to do to be ready?
“Who then is the faithful and wise servant, whom the master has put in charge of the servants in his household to give them their food at the proper time? It will be good for that servant whose master finds him doing so when he returns. Truly I tell you, he will put him in charge of all his possessions. But suppose that servant is wicked and says to himself, ‘My master is staying away a long time,’ and he then begins to beat his fellow servants and to eat and drink with drunkards. The master of that servant will come on a day when he does not expect him and at an hour he is not aware of. He will cut him to pieces and assign him a place with the hypocrites, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.”
This teaching is a little tricky, but pretty straightforward, especially in the context of the last few days and a withered fig tree in the distance. The answer to the question about the steward is easy. The faithful and wise steward represents the priests. However, as we have seen, they are certainly not getting the job done.

If we see this discourse as one conversation given in response to the disciples’ question, it helps us see the packaged answer Jesus gives them, without getting lost in our infatuations with the end times. Jesus’s response would sound something like this:

You’re going to hear rumors of the end and false messiahs; do not believe it.

The world is going to get crazy and there is nothing you can do to stop it.

All of this is going to have to happen and you will have to persevere.

You will have to be ready; being ready means taking care of God’s people.

The priests aren’t doing it, so you will have to.

Persevere and be ready by taking care of the oppressed.


Of course, as always, Jesus isn’t done. He has some parables to throw on top of this teaching…

7.02.2015

Six or Seven?

It seems that while the Pharisees are taking this information about Jesus’s yoke, Jesus doesn’t even give them time to set up a trap. Suddenly going on the offensive against the Pharisees now (it was the Sadducees earlier), Jesus gives them a real brain-teaser that apparently stumps the teachers so much that “no one dared to ask him any more questions.”

But Jesus isn’t about to let them off the hook. Having just made a minor public spectacle of some highly trained teachers, Jesus turns to the crowds and his disciples saying:
“The scribes and the Pharisees sit on Moses’ seat, so do and observe whatever they tell you, but not the works they do. For they preach, but do not practice. They tie up heavy burdens, hard to bear, and lay them on people’s shoulders, but they themselves are not willing to move them with their finger. They do all their deeds to be seen by others. For they make their phylacteries broad and their fringes long, and they love the place of honor at feasts and the best seats in the synagogues and greetings in the marketplaces and being called rabbi by others. But you are not to be called rabbi, for you have one teacher, and you are all brothers. And call no man your father on earth, for you have one Father, who is in heaven. Neither be called instructors, for you have one instructor, the Christ. The greatest among you shall be your servant. Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted.”
It should be noted that Jesus does affirm the place of these teachers within Jewish society. He affirms their devotion to obedience and the soundness of their teaching, along with their commitment to the Text. The thing that Jesus appears to have a problem with is their interaction, expectation, and dealings with other people. He doesn’t like how they tie up expectations and load up the guilt without doing anything to help relieve people of their burdens. He also isn’t a fan of how they seem to put their righteousness on display in order to receive the approval of men. Instead, he’s wanting to call people to serve one another, not impress them.

However, Jesus has some tough things to say to the Pharisees in the crowd that day:
“But woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you shut the kingdom of heaven in people’s faces. For you neither enter yourselves nor allow those who would enter to go in. Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you travel across sea and land to make a single proselyte, and when he becomes a proselyte, you make him twice as much a child of hell as yourselves.
Woe to you, blind guides, who say, ‘If anyone swears by the temple, it is nothing, but if anyone swears by the gold of the temple, he is bound by his oath.’ You blind fools! For which is greater, the gold or the temple that has made the gold sacred? And you say, ‘If anyone swears by the altar, it is nothing, but if anyone swears by the gift that is on the altar, he is bound by his oath.’ You blind men! For which is greater, the gift or the altar that makes the gift sacred? So whoever swears by the altar swears by it and by everything on it. And whoever swears by the temple swears by it and by him who dwells in it. And whoever swears by heaven swears by the throne of God and by him who sits upon it. 
Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you tithe mint and dill and cumin, and have neglected the weightier matters of the law: justice and mercy and faithfulness. These you ought to have done, without neglecting the others. You blind guides, straining out a gnat and swallowing a camel!
Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you clean the outside of the cup and the plate, but inside they are full of greed and self-indulgence. You blind Pharisee! First clean the inside of the cup and the plate, that the outside also may be clean.
Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you are like whitewashed tombs, which outwardly appear beautiful, but within are full of dead people’s bones and all uncleanness. So you also outwardly appear righteous to others, but within you are full of hypocrisy and lawlessness.
Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you build the tombs of the prophets and decorate the monuments of the righteous, saying, ‘If we had lived in the days of our fathers, we would not have taken part with them in shedding the blood of the prophets.’ Thus you witness against yourselves that you are sons of those who murdered the prophets.”

Now, for the Jewish listener, the moment you heard a teacher prophetically give a list of woes, you are going to think of Isaiah immediately. In chapter 5, Isaiah gives his own list of woes.
Woe to those who join house to house,    who add field to field,until there is no more room,    and you are made to dwell alone    in the midst of the land.The LORD of hosts has sworn in my hearing:“Surely many houses shall be desolate,    large and beautiful houses, without inhabitant.For ten acres of vineyard shall yield but one bath,    and a homer of seed shall yield but an ephah.”
Woe to those who rise early in the morning,
    that they may run after strong drink,
who tarry late into the evening
    as wine inflames them!
They have lyre and harp,
    tambourine and flute and wine at their feasts,
but they do not regard the deeds of the LORD,
    or see the work of his hands.
Therefore my people go into exile
    for lack of knowledge;
their honored men go hungry,
    and their multitude is parched with thirst.
Therefore Sheol has enlarged its appetite
    and opened its mouth beyond measure,
and the nobility of Jerusalem and her multitude will go down,
    her revelers and he who exults in her.
Man is humbled, and each one is brought low,
    and the eyes of the haughty are brought low.
But the LORD of hosts is exalted in justice,
    and the Holy God shows himself holy in righteousness.
Then shall the lambs graze as in their pasture,
    and nomads shall eat among the ruins of the rich.
Woe to those who draw iniquity with cords of falsehood,
    who draw sin as with cart ropes,
who say: “Let him be quick,
    let him speed his work
    that we may see it;
let the counsel of the Holy One of Israel draw near,
    and let it come, that we may know it!”
Woe to those who call evil good
    and good evil,
who put darkness for light
    and light for darkness,
who put bitter for sweet
    and sweet for bitter!
Woe to those who are wise in their own eyes,
    and shrewd in their own sight!
Woe to those who are heroes at drinking wine,
    and valiant men in mixing strong drink,
who acquit the guilty for a bribe,
    and deprive the innocent of his right!

If one were to compare these two lists of denouncements, they would notice the kind of person described is quite different. Go ahead, take a second to look at Isaiah 5 and ask the question, “What kind of person is being condemned?” Then, ask the same question of Matthew 23.

What did you find?

I do this exercise with my students and they never fail to articulate the same thing. Isaiah’s woes describe a person who is wrapped up in selfishness and greed. It’s a disgusting picture of a person who has completely lost the plot of God’s story. They oppress others, serve self, and live for injustice. The woes of Matthew 23 describe a person who is self-righteous.

But did you notice? Extra credit to anyone who counted the woes.

In Isaiah, there are six woes; an appropriate number for woes that are denouncing sin, right? But in Jesus’s denouncement, there are seven.

Jesus’s point: “You have perfected the art of evil and sin.”

Do you know what’s even worse than a greedy person? A self-righteous person.

How can you possibly take sin and greed and take it to the next level? You can become a cold, self-righteous “know-it-all” who actually destroys the work of God. This is why self-righteousness is so significant. These people claim to speak for God, yet they put a completely counterfeit version of God on display to the world around them. It’s even worse than the sin of greed, because at least people know greed when they see it.

By inserting a seventh woe, Jesus says they have completed the sin of their forefathers. This is evidenced further by reading Jesus’s closing to this denouncement:
Fill up, then, the measure of your fathers. You serpents, you brood of vipers, how are you to escape being sentenced to hell? Therefore I send you prophets and wise men and scribes, some of whom you will kill and crucify, and some you will flog in your synagogues and persecute from town to town, so that on you may come all the righteous blood shed on earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah the son of Barachiah, whom you murdered between the sanctuary and the altar. Truly, I say to you, all these things will come upon this generation.”
Jesus says, “Fill up, then, the measure of your fathers.” 

In the NIV, Jesus says,”Go ahead, then, and complete what your ancestors started.”

It’s a striking warning that I try to be reminded of frequently. I belong to a generation bent on restoring justice to the world we live in. We cringe at the idea of greed and the oppression of the weak. Yet, if we are not careful, we can be in danger of an even greater sin. We have been repentant of the greed and waste and destruction of our forefathers. We have seen the abuse of the earth, the abuse of aliens and slaves, the abuse of resources, the abuse of power. We must be very careful not to miss the pride that lurks under the surface of our self-righteousness. We must work to hear the words of Jesus warning us to make sure we see ALL people, help and serve ALL people, and pursue humility in our walk after God.

Let’s not perfect the art of sin.

Let’s not complete what our fathers started.

6.29.2015

the Greatest

The Pharisees end up hearing that Jesus has, in fact, silenced the Sadducees with his teaching. In the gospel of Matthew, a teacher of the Law approaches Jesus to ask him about the greatest commandments. The way it reads in Matthew, it sounds as if the Pharisees are perplexed that Jesus was able to stump the Sadducees and wanted to do some follow-up. The question — “Which is the greatest commandment?” — is one that is very common in Jesus’s Jewish world. It is essentially asking the teacher what his interpretive lens is. What is his hermeneutical filter? How does he interpret the Scriptures?

“Great” commandments were really a statement about what the Jews called “weight.” Some laws carried more weight than others. If we can determine what the “weightiest” commandments are, it will help us know how to read our Text. For instance, Rahab has a dilemma when the men of Jericho come looking for the spies. In such an instance, she is going to break a law. She is either not going to protect the foreigner and allow them to be murdered, or she is going to lie. The question is one of weight. If she chooses correctly, she ends up fulfilling the law; if she chooses incorrectly, she abolishes it. Rahab chooses — intuitively, I might add (she is a pagan prostitute, after all) — that protecting the foreigner carries more weight than abstaining from lies. She decides correctly and ends up in the “Hall of Faith” (Hebrews 11).

In Jesus’s day, there were two dominant “yokes” or sets of interpretation that were held. They came from the schools of Shammai and Hillel. Shammai declared the two greatest commandments were “love God with all your heart and all your soul and all your might” and “obey the Sabbath.” This made Shammai’s yoke centered on obedience. Obedience is the weightiest call in each situation. But Hillel said it was “love God…” and “love your neighbor as yourself,” making the weightiest call the call to love.

Jesus agrees with Hillel.

In Matthew, this appears to answer the question and they move on. But in Luke, this question sees a little more treatment. I personally believe we are not dealing with parallel stories in this instance, but we are dealing with the same question. Again, this is one of the most common questions a rabbi would be asked in Jesus’s world, so we would expect multiple interactions. In Luke, the questioner asks Jesus about the greatest commandment and receives the same answer.
And behold, a lawyer stood up to put him to the test, saying, “Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?” He said to him, “What is written in the Law? How do you read it?” And he answered, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind, and your neighbor as yourself.” And he said to him, “You have answered correctly; do this, and you will live.”
But he, desiring to justify himself, said to Jesus, “And who is my neighbor?”
Desiring to justify himself? What is that all about?

Jesus, like a brilliant rabbi, has just turned the entire situation back around onto the person asking the question. Since the man is a lawyer (a person who studies the Law), Jesus asks him what his yoke is. The man replies and Jesus agrees. The whole situation would be slightly humorous to those listening in on the conversation. So in order to justify himself, he asks about the neighbor.

And justify himself, he does. Because the debate surrounding “who is my neighbor” was a fierce one. He asks a doozy of a question.

But Jesus’s response is even better. I have had more than one teacher tell me that Jesus’s parable surrounding the Good Samaritan is one of the most brilliant parables told in Jewish history. So in order to understand Jesus’s teaching, we have to set the stage.


P’SHAT
Rabbis of the first century liked to tell parables with a common template. Doing so allowed them to keep some of the variables constant for the hearers and allow them to wrestle with the content of the parable with less confusion (or should we say, it allowed them to put the confusion where they wanted it to be). One of the most common templates we have in written record is the template of the Priest, the Levite, and the Pharisee. Whatever the content of the parable was, the characters were always the same, and each played the same role.

The priest would do it wrong. The Levite would also do it wrong. But the Pharisee would do it right.

In response to the neighbor question, Jesus begins a parable following this typical template. A man is beat up and needs help. The priest refuses and the Levite refuses. (It should be noted that they have good reasons to refuse: they are trying to be obedient to their role as priests who need to stay clean — but they are using the yoke.) At this point in the conversation, everybody knows who is coming next to save the day — the Pharisee.

But Jesus changes the story. “Along came a Samaritan…”

And you could have heard a pin drop.

What we also don’t understand is the background to the “who is my neighbor” debate.

“Shammai! Who is my neighbor?” 
He would have responded, “Your fellow Jew.”
“Do I have to love the Roman?”
“No, you do not; they are our enemy.”

“Hillel! Who is my neighbor?”
“Your fellow Jew.”
“Do I have to love the Roman?”
“Yes, they are your neighbor as well.”
“Do I have to love a Samaritan?”
“Of course not! Nobody should love a Samaritan!”

In Jesus’s story, he pushes the envelope far beyond what any listener would have been comfortable with. Jesus is clearly stating that even Hillel doesn’t go far enough with his love! Not only this, but the Samaritan isn’t even the one receiving the love — he’s the one being obedient! And all of this information, which has made this parable jump off of the page, is simply p’shat.


REMEZ
Did you know Jesus wasn’t even the one who came up with this story? It took place centuries before, and it’s in your Text: 2 Chronicles 28. In the story, the king of Samaria has defeated Judah. He is celebrating his spoils and treating the prisoners poorly when the prophet comes and tells him that God is not happy. He handed the people of Judah over to him because of His discipline, but He is not happy with how they are being treated by the king. The king thoughtfully repents:
So the armed men left the captives and the spoil before the princes and all the assembly. And the men who have been mentioned by name rose and took the captives, and with the spoil they clothed all who were naked among them. They clothed them, gave them sandals, provided them with food and drink, and anointed them, and carrying all the feeble among them on donkeys, they brought them to their kinsfolk at Jericho, the city of palm trees. Then they returned to Samaria.
This story has already happened! It’s a brilliant remez.


DRASH
As it stands, this is already an incredible teaching, but we have yet to uncover the drash. I worked for years trying to uncover the meaning. Then last year, one of my college students uncovered a chiasm in 2 Chronicles 28. Here is a depiction of the chiasm in the story of Chronicles:

Ahaz sacrifices to other gods (Baal)
The Lord humbles Ahaz with Aram and Isreal
Migration of people to Damascus
Man of Ephraim
Prophet Obed — “Restorer”
Men of Ephraim
Migration of people to Jericho
The Lord humbles Ahaz with Assyria
Ahaz sacrifices to other gods (Damascus)

The center of the chiasm ends up being Obed’s statement that they are to show mercy and love their enemies.



I don’t know if the lawyer’s mind exploded upon hearing this parable. I know he’s not even willing to say the name “Samaritan” when he answers Jesus. He apparently had a thought to ponder that night.

And again, if we are actually willing to hear the parable and not merely study it, so do we.

He who has ears, let him hear.

6.24.2015

Image and Inscription

** I am indebted to Ray VanderLaan for much of the teaching in this post.

Apparently, in the midst of this story telling from Jesus during this week, these spiritual leaders decide it’s time to go on the offensive. The Pharisees and Sadducees work together (which is almost unfathomable; the two parties cannot stand each other) to try and trap Jesus in order to remove him from his place of influence.

One of the great Jewish debates of Jesus’s day was the debate that swirled around paying “taxes.” These “great debates” were fueled in large part by two rabbinic voices we haven’t talked about much. However, to understand the context of these two rabbinical schools is to have a much clearer perspective on the Jewish world of Jesus.

In the rabbinical generation that preceded Jesus, there were two rabbis who argued vehemently about the great Jewish debates. As we’ve seen, there was a conservative rabbi who held an interpretation of the law driven by the priorities of obedience (more on this in a later post). His name was Shammai. In the other corner was a rabbi who held to a much more progressive interpretation revolving around love for one’s neighbor. His name was Hillel. These two worldviews competed passionately over the interpretation of the law in matters of great debate.

Nevertheless, in order to understand the context of the debate about taxes, we need to first point out that the real issue isn’t about taxes at all. The gospel of Luke seems to give us clues by choosing the Greek word kensos to speak of taxes. The King James Version translates this more accurately as “tribute.” The debate isn’t asking about paying taxes as you and I would be familiar with paying taxes. In fact, the tribute they speak of was a particular coin that every resident in the Roman world was expected to purchase. This tribute coin could be used as a “receipt” that proved you had paid tribute to Caesar and to Rome. Upon validation of this receipt, you could be given incense at any number of different outposts where tribute was paid. You would offer the incense — and your worship — to Caesar.

Ruins of the temple at Omrit, just south of Caesarea Philippi
It should be worth noting that we have uncovered one of three tribute temples constructed by Herod the Great less than two miles from Caesarea Philippi, where the disciples have recently been, before Jesus set his course toward Jerusalem.

Now, understanding this context helps us understand the question being debated. It’s not just about paying money; the question is about idol worship. Realize that amongst the differing Jewish responses we’ve looked at before, there would have been differing opinions.

HERODIAN: “Sure, pay the tribute; God knows what’s in your heart.”
SADDUCEE: “Of course. Do you know what Rome gives us? Don’t make them angry!”
ESSENE: “You don’t have to pay tribute when you live out here in the desert…”
ZEALOT: “Anyone who offers tribute deserves to die!”

The PHARISEES, however, were split on the issue, depending on whether they held to Shammai or Hillel’s interpretation. Shammai Pharisees would have claimed this is an issue of idolatry and obedience demands we not purchase the coin. However, Hillel had a much different interpretation. Pointing to the book of Jeremiah and showing that God says He was using Nebuchadnezzar (one of the most brutal tyrants in human history) to do His will and the kingdom was being given to him, Hillel said that the ruling authorities are put in place by God. Therefore, when one buys the tribute coin, they are not taking part in idolatry, but simply giving back to the ruler what God has decided in His sovereign will to give him in the first place.

Notice the trap they set for Jesus:
Then the Pharisees went out and laid plans to trap him in his words. They sent their disciples to him along with the Herodians. “Teacher,” they said, “we know that you are a man of integrity and that you teach the way of God in accordance with the truth. You aren’t swayed by others, because you pay no attention to who they are. Tell us then, what is your opinion? Is it right to pay the imperial tax to Caesar or not?”
In this sole mention of the Herodians, it is pointed out that they are conspiring along with the Hasidim, the very people who have an opposing worldview. They are setting Jesus up for failure. No matter how he answers, he’s going to make one of the groups angry; he’s either going to look like a compromising idolator or he’ll lose favor with the people.

But Jesus is a brilliant teacher.

He asks somebody to give him a coin — which is a really funny move. They are standing on the Temple Mount, where it is unlawful in Judaism to have Roman currency. In the words of my teacher, this is like a person questioning your position on pornography, and in response you ask for a Playboy and somebody hands you one. You’ve now shown the teacher where you fall in the argument, but he still hasn’t told you anything about his own opinion. We would assume one of the Herodians produced the coin, but still, that’s funny.

Jesus wants to know two things: whose image and whose inscription?

Now the image will be of Caesar and the inscription is going to speak of the divinity and worship of Caesar as a divine god. The tribute coin I have seen in person contains the inscription, “The worshipped son of a worshipped god.”

The people answer, “It’s Caesar’s inscription.”

The implication here is an unspoken question: Whose image and whose inscription is on you?

And in a stunning moment fit for a poetry slam, Jesus declares, “Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s, but give to God what is God’s.” Actually, the King James Version will nail the translation again with the word “render.” The word render means “to give back.” Jesus uses Hillel’s position, but not without making it crystal clear that your worship belongs to God and God alone.

In other words, Jesus says, “Give Caesar his stupid coin, but don’t you EVER give him your worship!”

**mic drop**

And in that moment, every group is challenged by his words. The Herodians. The Shammai Pharisees. The Hillel Pharisees. The Sadducees. The Zealots.

It’s brilliant.

It challenges us, as well. It challenges us to consider the things we pledge allegiance to. It challenges us to consider the things that become the object of our hope — and our worship. It challenges us to wonder whether there can be another Empire other than God’s.
But Jesus, knowing their evil intent, said, “You hypocrites, why are you trying to trap me? Show me the coin used for paying the tax.” They brought him a denarius, and he asked them, “Whose image is this? And whose inscription?”
“Caesar’s,” they replied.
Then he said to them, “So give back to Caesar what is Caesar’s, and to God what is God’s.”
When they heard this, they were amazed. So they left him and went away.

6.21.2015

The Approval of a Father

This week, I returned from a two-week adventure in the outdoors. We took the occasional break in a hotel room, but we stayed at three different campsites that took us on a loop through northern Idaho and into western Montana. I posted some pictures on my social networking sites, some of which were playful and in good humor, while others were serious and reflective. I definitely received the typical razzing I would expect from friends as they commented on the “glamping” I was doing in a camper loaned to us for the trip (what a blessing!), the Crocs I was wearing, and the Dora the Explorer lawn chair that belongs to my daughter. I received those jokes with joy.

But for me, this camping trip was deeply personal. This trip was about my dad.

The personal nature of this trip was planned and intentional; I was mentally engaged in this trip from the outset. It was not something that snuck up on me. My dad and I are similar and different (as I’m sure is the case with most all of us). I have some things about me that are dead ringers for my father, but our personalities are — in many ways — miles apart. My dad was always a man’s man as I grew up. He loves to build and fix things and work with his hands. My dad seems to be most at home when he has power tools in his hands, or when he’s under the hood of a car. As far as I know, this has always been true about him.

This has never been true about me. No, I seem to have the reverse feeling regarding things I build. I’m always slightly scared of power tools (a bad combination with my ignorance). And when I fix things, there’s an irrefutable law of the universe I deal with I call “Marty’s Law”; Marty’s Law is similar to Murphy’s, except it has an added financial component: If something can go wrong, it will — and it’s going to cost you exponentially more money.

I hate working on cars because I’m horrible at it and very impatient. I don’t like building things because of my incompetence. And the only power tool that ever felt comfortable for me is my brain. My poor dad had to have his only son prefer an encyclopedia to radial arm saw.

You see, I went on this camping trip partially because it’s one of the things I remember my dad doing with us as a family when I was young. And while I might not be able to fix your car or build you a bookshelf — dang it, I can camp. So I set out to do something without the help of anyone else. I wanted to be the hero for my kids that my dad was for me. I wanted to lead my family to somewhere that resembled the places my dad tried to lead me. I wanted to be like my dad.

Now, I know part of that seems ridiculous for a thirty-three-year-old man to be talking like this about his dad, but I know I’m not the only one who wrestles with these things. And I know that when I started out on this camping trip, I started under the false impression that I wanted to “make my dad proud.” And so I set off to prepare for the trip. And I made my lists and I bought the supplies. I researched the driving routes and the common pitfalls I would experience along the way. When I went to pick up the camper offered to us and I realized that what I thought was going to be a 10’ pop-up tent trailer was actually a 28’, 9000-pound camper — making me a 42’ mass of moving vehicle on the back roads of Montana — I gulped down my fear, thought of my dad, and hitched it up. There was even one point on the trip where I believe I subconsciously “chose” to take the ridiculously perilous road, just because I wanted to be like my dad.

And you know what? We did it.

I use the plural “we” to speak of my family. I use the plural “we” to remind myself that this trip was never about me on my own. My wife and my kids were always there with me. There was never-ending provision and blessing from God throughout the entire adventure. And so I use “we” to remind us of these truths.

But I also use “we” to refer to my dad and me. We did it.

And at one point on the trip, I remember a tear rolling down my cheek as I thought to myself, “Yeah. Dad would be proud.” And in that same moment I realized this was never about whether Dad was “proud of me.”

You see, my dad has never done anything to make me question whether or not he was proud of me. My dad has told me with his words and shown me with his actions. My dad has never — to my memory — talked down to me or belittled me for who I am or who God’s made me to be. I have never felt like a failure to my dad; even in my moments of failure, my dad has never let those moments define me. He’s never held them over my head or kept a scorecard of my screw-ups.

My dad is a model of humility and faithfulness. As my dad has grown older, it seems he’s become even more of a learner; the older he gets, the more he has been changed. Maybe that’s just my eyes maturing as an observant son, but as a guy who makes his living by dealing with people, that kind of humility is so incredibly rare. My dad’s faithfulness has astounded me throughout the years. In a world where it becomes difficult to find someone who isn’t driven by their own shallow desires and comfort, my dad has shown me what it means to be disciplined. Day after day after day, my father has gotten out of bed to do the things that need to be done — work, lead the family, help his wife, raise his kids, serve others — day after day after day. To my knowledge, my father has never complained about his career, resisted in his relationships, or given up on his children. My dad does the things you need to do because, well, they need to be done.

So, this recent trip really wasn’t about “making Dad proud,” because I’ve always known I have my father’s approval. This trip, for me, was about honoring my dad.

As I get older, I keep hearing this phrase from my wife and others (with increasing regularity): “That was just like your dad.” Usually a facial expression or a saying that I’ll use will solicit this comparison. It struck me recently how blessed I am to hear those words as something that makes me proud. Far too many people seem to live with the desire to, no matter what, not be like their parents. I guess I’m just blessed to have a dad I want to look like (and no, I’m not talking about physical appearances; my father certainly never grew a huge beard or shaved his dome). If I can pick up even a bit of my dad’s character, I’ll be a far better man/father/husband than I am today.

Maybe we spend so much time searching for our father’s approval that we forget to extend our own.


So Dad, I’m proud of you, in the deepest sense of the word. And we did it — me and the legacy you’re leaving in my life. We went camping and towed the trailer and used the camper stove and made fires and even rented a canoe. (So maybe that last one was just me; you never really were a water guy.) And there were times I wanted to take the easy way out and there were times when I was even a little scared, but we did it. We did it because I want to be a hero to my kids the same way “Grandpa” was to me. Most importantly, I hope that when they’re older, they too will say the greatest hero moments in their lives weren’t campfires, trucks, and trailers — but they were the moments when my character looked a little like yours.

I love you, Dad.

Happy Father’s Day.



6.05.2015

Gone Fishing...

It's time for summer vacations! Are you taking one? You should. Jesus did. I know I am. In fact, I'll be out away from the computer for a couple of weeks (always a good decision). So don't fret. On June 22nd, we'll be picking up right where we left off!

6.02.2015

Breaking Dress Code

After giving the spiritual leaders of Israel some time to consider his teaching (at least that’s how it reads in Matthew), Jesus moves on to his next parable. This will be the parable of the wedding banquet.
Jesus spoke to them again in parables, saying: “The kingdom of heaven is like a king who prepared a wedding banquet for his son. He sent his servants to those who had been invited to the banquet to tell them to come, but they refused to come.”
The setting of this parable, especially following the parable of the tenants, will be much easier to decipher on a p’shat level. The Kingdom of Heaven is like a party (which I feel is nearly enough to chew on without going any further, but I digress…) that has been thrown by God. He invited His people to be the firstcomers to this party, but just like the elder brothers they are, they refuse to go in.
“Then he sent some more servants and said, ‘Tell those who have been invited that I have prepared my dinner: My oxen and fattened cattle have been butchered, and everything is ready. Come to the wedding banquet.’ 
“But they paid no attention and went off—one to his field, another to his business. The rest seized his servants, mistreated them and killed them. The king was enraged. He sent his army and destroyed those murderers and burned their city.”

I think it’s interesting that Jesus comes into Jerusalem on this final week so clearly convinced of the impending doom and destruction of the city of Jerusalem at the hands of the Romans (more on this in later posts), but he certainly does. He paints a picture of God’s relentless pursuit of His people and an invitation that keeps going out, but it is ignored, disrespected, and despised.
“Then he said to his servants, ‘The wedding banquet is ready, but those I invited did not deserve to come. So go to the street corners and invite to the banquet anyone you find.’ So the servants went out into the streets and gathered all the people they could find, the bad as well as the good, and the wedding hall was filled with guests.”
And Matthew’s agenda is again seen in full effect here in Jesus’s teaching. God will have His party. While the invitations are initially sent to His firstborn children, He will have His party, one way or another. And so He fills His banquet hall with anyone who is willing to come and be a part of His celebration.

A pause here is certainly warranted. With only a p’shat level reading, there is much at this point in the teaching for those of us who call ourselves “followers” to consider. The setting of the parable is one that haunts me routinely. God is throwing a party. Apparently, this party is not the kind of party that I am prepared for. It’s not thrown at the right time, in the right way, or in the right place. The religious, the people who claim to speak for God, the ones on the guest list do not seem to be interested in this party God is throwing — and it leads to their demise.

Am I insistent that God throw the kind of party I would throw? 
Am I blinded by the fact that God’s definition of a party isn’t mine? 
Am I so distracted by the worries of this world, my own personal agendas, and idolatry of self to hear the invitation?



Apparently the religious folks have a hard time realizing God is throwing a party.

While I’m tempted to assume this passage doesn’t apply to me, I think that deep down I know better. I think that over time I begin to believe God works for me, and He throws the kinds of parties I want, when I want, and where I want them.

And I’m afraid I miss out on far too many of the parties that God is actually throwing.

But Jesus’s point isn’t directed at just anybody. Jesus is hurling this parable at the religious leaders of Israel. It’s at this point the teaching takes an incredibly awkward turn:
“Then he said to his servants, ‘The wedding banquet is ready, but those I invited did not deserve to come. So go to the street corners and invite to the banquet anyone you find.’ So the servants went out into the streets and gathered all the people they could find, the bad as well as the good, and the wedding hall was filled with guests. 
“But when the king came in to see the guests, he noticed a man there who was not wearing wedding clothes. He asked, ‘How did you get in here without wedding clothes, friend?’ The man was speechless. 
“Then the king told the attendants, ‘Tie him hand and foot, and throw him outside, into the darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’ 
“For many are invited, but few are chosen.”

Not wearing wedding clothes? What?

I have been told that in this world, if a king were to throw such a banquet he would also provide the attire. Part of your attendance would include a willingness to come early, prepare yourself for the celebration, and dress appropriately. I have never been able to verify this and I’m not sure it’s true, but on a p’shat level it seems as though this might insinuate a person who wants to be a part of the celebration, but not recognize God’s design, desire, or authority. He wants to be a part of God’s will, he just doesn’t want to do it God’s way.

But I think there might be more than that going on here. I think it may be linking us to our remez. Consider Zephaniah 1, a prophecy leveled against a corrupt priesthood:
“On the day of the Lord’s sacrifice    I will punish the officials    and the king’s sonsand all those clad    in foreign clothes.On that day I will punish    all who avoid stepping on the threshold,who fill the temple of their gods    with violence and deceit. 
“On that day,”
    declares the Lord,
“a cry will go up from the Fish Gate,
    wailing from the New Quarter,
    and a loud crash from the hills.
Wail, you who live in the market district;
    all your merchants will be wiped out,
    all who trade with silver will be destroyed.
At that time I will search Jerusalem with lamps
    and punish those who are complacent,
    who are like wine left on its dregs,
who think, ‘The Lord will do nothing,
    either good or bad.’
Their wealth will be plundered,
    their houses demolished.
Though they build houses,
    they will not live in them;
though they plant vineyards,
    they will not drink the wine.” 
The great day of the Lord is near—
    near and coming quickly.
The cry on the day of the Lord is bitter;
    the Mighty Warrior shouts his battle cry.
That day will be a day of wrath—
    a day of distress and anguish,
        a day of trouble and ruin,
    a day of darkness and gloom,
        a day of clouds and blackness—
    a day of trumpet and battle cry
against the fortified cities
    and against the corner towers. 
“I will bring such distress on all people
    that they will grope about like those who are blind,
    because they have sinned against the Lord.
Their blood will be poured out like dust
    and their entrails like dung.
Neither their silver nor their gold
    will be able to save them
    on the day of the Lord’s wrath.”

The drash of this parable turns into a scathing retort of the Sadducees. They sure want to be a part of God’s party, but they have no interest in doing it God’s way. And Jesus foretells of the doom that awaits them because they refuse to care for God’s people. They continue to take advantage of those who are trying to find and worship God.

Of course, Jesus is still not done interacting with these corrupt leaders…